Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1135G7 36,962 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	52.7% Above average	Memory 57.4 1-Core 104 2-Core 168 62% 110 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 382 40% 321 Pts	64-Core 354 22% 354 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Sanyo(144D C195) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9030 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.01% Terrible	Lighting 11.2 Reflection 10.5 Parallax 10.7 9% 10.8 fps	MRender 9.9 Gravity 14.3 Splatting 0.1 6% 8.1 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.01% Great: 20%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssstc CL1-8D256 256GB 516 User benchmarks, average bench 130% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: CT22005 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 159 194 172 134 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 1,396 Write 403 Mixed 452 SusWrite 167 132% 605 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 14.5 68% 17.2 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 161%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	40% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 11.8 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 10.8 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	956x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 9%, 39,662 samples	515x
GeForce MX450NvidiaBench 29%, 1,913 samples	13x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-000 256GBSamsungBench 114%, 724 samples	512x
CL1-8D256 256GBSsstcBench 130%, 516 samples	171x
MZVLQ256HBJD-00B 256GBSamsungBench 152%, 710 samples	88x