Today's hottest deals

Asrock J4105M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics39.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock J4105M  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '22 at 18:51
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4105
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 38.5
1-Core 56.7
2-Core 110
38% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 217
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$245
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.3% Below average
Lighting 41
Reflection 60
Parallax 84.2
33% 61.7 fps
MRender 91.6
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 58.4
51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 93%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 122 127 129 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 410
Write 136
Mixed 199
SusWrite 125
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 27.8
95% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 140
118% 176 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
SK_Hynix HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.1% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 12.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 209
19% 209 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J4105M Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J4105M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback