Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '22 at 09:46
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Eight-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 68.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 230
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 671
67% 545 Pts
64-Core 769
48% 769 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.6% Outstanding
Lighting 110
Reflection 96.4
Parallax 118
90% 108 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 117
Splatting 97.5
95% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 250GB
181GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 538 597 578 249 473 274 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 77%
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB
683GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 308 399 473 317 485 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.8% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback