Today's hottest deals

HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory5.6 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '22 at 13:28
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3550
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 134
60% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 320
43% 319 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 93 94 90 102 150 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.2% Above average
Read 196
Write 237
Mixed 193
SusWrite 101
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 33.8
110% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 198
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 115%
Jmicron Tech 256GB
216GB free
Firmware: 0208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 20 19 19 21 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 29.9
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 20.6
20% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 7.7
1,319% 7.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5173EB0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5173EB0-CK0 42GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.3% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback