Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite C660D (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PWWBE
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '22 at 19:44
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	DZA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-240 462 User benchmarks, average bench 24% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.1% Terrible	Memory 15.1 1-Core 4.7 2-Core 7.4 7% 9.08 Pts	4-Core 7.4 8-Core 5 1% 6.2 Pts	64-Core 7.4 0% 7.4 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.1% Great: 42%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5065GSXN 500GB 2,133 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 451GB free (System drive) Firmware: GH10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 36 51 56 52 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 4.9 Write 25.1 Mixed 13 SusWrite 49.7 17% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	3.56% Terrible	MC Read 1.2 MC Write 0.8 MC Mixed 1.5 3% 1.17 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 0.3 SC Mixed 0.1 1% 0.2 GB/s	Latency 359 11% 359 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 3.56% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	33x
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	8x
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	7x

SSD
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	2x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	2x
470 Series SSD 64GBSamsungBench 34%, 753 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	7x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	4x
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GBUnknownBench 25%, 62 samples	4x

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $120

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16