Today's hottest deals

Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111012
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '22 at 19:57
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 16%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2640M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 52.5
48% 66 Pts
4-Core 44.9
8-Core 183
12% 114 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B6) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.5 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 87 87 90 90 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 113
Write 116
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 89.3
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 75%
TS-RDF5A Transcend 128GB
119GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 23 24 24 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 23.5
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 23.6
34% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3.1
199% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CM0-CH9 04CB AD73I1C1674EV 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 15.5
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B Builds (Compare 296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback