Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC7i5BNB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel NUC7i5BNH
MotherboardIntel NUC7i5BNB  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1200 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210901
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateJan 04 '22 at 16:25
Run Duration926 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7260U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 159
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 251
32% 243 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV77D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 167 167 165 171 170 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 904
Write 218
Mixed 251
SusWrite 168
84% 385 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 29.3
129% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 551
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 308
248% 360 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 102%
Great: 147%
TOSHIBA HDWR21C 12TB
4.5TB free, PID 0715
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 178 174 179 177 176 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.9% Good
Read 163
Write 189
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 177
202% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.17 MB/s
TOSHIBA HDWR21C 12TB
1TB free, PID 0715
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 154 152 157 155 152 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.5% Good
Read 147
Write 148
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 154
170% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Prolific RAID0 16TB
14.5TB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 342 318 319 343 339 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
Read 54.1
Write 275
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 332
278% 181 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.9
260% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.4% Good
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 11.9
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 11.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC7i5BNB Builds (Compare 442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7i5BNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback