Intel AlderLake-S ADP-S DDR5 UDIMM CRB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel Alder Lake Client Platform
MotherboardIntel AlderLake-S ADP-S DDR5 UDIMM CRB  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 04:31
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.5% Very good
Memory 53.6
1-Core 134
2-Core 215
72% 134 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 767
78% 634 Pts
64-Core 1,256
78% 1,256 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 8.6
6% 9.13 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1
1% 1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel HBRPEKNX0202A 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 895 911 884 894 697 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,294
Write 896
Mixed 811
SusWrite 723
208% 931 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 61.4
208% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 764
DQ Mixed 341
318% 478 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 185%
Great: 212%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
23GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 140
Write 18.9
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 11.8
48% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1
79% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 26%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix CG78MEBUA081N 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 2000 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.1% Above average
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 16.3
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AlderLake-S ADP-S DDR5 UDIMM CRB Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Intel AlderLake-S ADP-S DDR5 UDIMM CRB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback