Asus X750JN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus X750JN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X750JN
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140411
Uptime18.9 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 16:55
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 35.3
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 116
46% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 315
32% 260 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 16FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.67% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 1.3
0% 5.43 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.67%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 407 404 418 404 420 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
62% Good
Read 390
Write 331
Mixed 346
SusWrite 403
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 17.1
55% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 92
DQ Mixed 105
79% 105 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 62%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX8GX3M1A1600C10 0215 CMSX8GX3M1A1600C10 16GB
1600, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.8% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 13.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 5.9
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 226
18% 226 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X750JN Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X750JN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback