Today's hottest deals

PEAQ PDT P30S4-I5H2/C408

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPEAQ PDT P30S4-I5H2/C408  (all builds)
MotherboardPEAQ H110H4-EM2
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170106
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 07 '22 at 19:04
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 56.1
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 116
43% 73.7 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 302
37% 284 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Sapphire(174B 6438) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.9% Average
Lighting 61.5
Reflection 92.7
Parallax 58.4
50% 70.9 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 61
Splatting 56.5
50% 61.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-00000 120GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 47 103 63 63 63 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 245
Write 181
Mixed 179
SusWrite 87.5
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 4.6
30% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 83.1
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 13.5
49% 103 MB/s
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
806GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 180 181 182 184 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 173
Mixed 100
SusWrite 181
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 103%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX 16GB
2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 18.9
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PDT P30S4-I5H2/C408 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: PEAQ PDT P30S4-I5H2/C408

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback