Pcware APM-A320G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPcware APM-A320G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE APM-A320G
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores, 640 x 480 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '22 at 22:20
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9500E APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Memory 43.3
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 95
40% 67.2 Pts
4-Core 94.5
8-Core 88.1
12% 91.3 Pts
64-Core 88.5
6% 88.5 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
EVGA(3842 6336) 2GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 18.7
15% 18.6 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 17
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EXBOMSSD-25SA120G 120GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 193 247 273 161 355 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 346
Write 340
Mixed 233
SusWrite 240
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 18.3
82% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 112
98% 144 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 88%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
416GB free
Firmware: 01.01S02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 108 118 122 78 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
66% Good
Read 120
Write 110
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 109
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WA5SD8G8C3UAZ TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.7% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 6.9
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical APM-A320G Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Pcware APM-A320G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback