HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJan 08 '22 at 08:37
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 132
63% 100 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 201
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Asus(1043 83FF) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.92% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 1.8
3% 3.07 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 2.8
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.92%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$23
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 66 58 96 100 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 117
Write 84.3
Mixed 67
SusWrite 80.3
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 1,145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback