Today's hottest deals

HP 500-369

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-369  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B17
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '22 at 17:18
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 137
53% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 215
28% 214 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.9% Below average
Lighting 42.6
Reflection 46.6
Parallax 55.5
35% 48.2 fps
MRender 45.9
Gravity 43.1
Splatting 32.7
32% 40.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 139 148 155 149 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 98.9
Write 123
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 141
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP698650-154-KEF PLEXHD HP698650-154-KEF PLEXHD 24GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.1% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-369 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-369

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback