Asrock Q1900M

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Q1900M (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181220
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '22 at 13:15
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1900 507 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Memory 57.9 1-Core 13.3 2-Core 43.3 27% 38.2 Pts	4-Core 86 8-Core 83.8 11% 84.9 Pts	64-Core 82.8 5% 82.8 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8423) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Lighting 19.6 Reflection 26.3 Parallax 35 16% 27 fps	MRender 33.4 Gravity 29.5 Splatting 25 24% 29.3 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 21%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4304RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 108 99 119 93 90 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.6% Below average	Read 220 Write 210 Mixed 185 SusWrite 112 41% 182 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 12.1 48% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 31.1 DQ Write 74.4 DQ Mixed 34.7 32% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-022.A00LF 2x4GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.4% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 10 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q1900M Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Q1900M

CPU
Celeron J1900IntelBench 34%, 6,116 samples	192x
Celeron J1900IntelBench 36%, 507 samples	10x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	131x
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	8x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	19x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380