Seewo MT61A-SHA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSeewo MT61A-SHA  (all builds)
MotherboardSEEWO MT61A-SHA
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210701
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 10 '22 at 06:51
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 172
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 567
55% 450 Pts
64-Core 689
43% 689 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.85% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.7
5% 7.6 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 10.9
7% 8.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.85%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison M.2 128GB SSO128GTLCG-SBC-2
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 194 100 52 72 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.7% Very good
Read 440
Write 331
Mixed 309
SusWrite 103
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 31.9
131% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 183
162% 240 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston SW26D4S9S1MEH-4 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.7% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 7.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MT61A-SHA Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Seewo MT61A-SHA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback