Bytespeed Value H81M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemBytespeed Value H81M-C  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H81M-C
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 15:29
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 166
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 321
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 118 126 119 128 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 462
Write 131
Mixed 171
SusWrite 124
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 36.7
142% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 167
147% 228 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$23
90GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 90 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 86.2
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 89.1
58% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Hynix HMT451U7AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.8% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Value H81M-C Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Bytespeed Value H81M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback