Today's hottest deals

HP SLIC-WKS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP SLIC-WKS  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C7
Memory321.7 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201210
Uptime63 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 19:19
Run Duration377 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6240
CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 80.9
1-Core 119
2-Core 237
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 862
78% 654 Pts
64-Core 2,244
139% 2,244 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000
HP(103C 129F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 175
Parallax 180
143% 177 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 159
Splatting 147
132% 164 fps
Poor: 122%
This bench: 132%
Great: 137%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HALR-000H2 1TB
699GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA71HAQ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 611 897 933 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,543
Write 984
Mixed 970
SusWrite 407
217% 976 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 32.7
122% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 530
DQ Write 556
DQ Mixed 534
404% 540 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 148%
Great: 321%
Samsung MZVLB2T0HMLB-000H1 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: EXB71H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 1191 1298 1296 1299 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,578
Write 1,022
Mixed 1,040
SusWrite 847
250% 1,122 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 33.6
127% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 520
DQ Write 612
DQ Mixed 545
416% 559 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 179%
Great: 328%
Crucial MTFDDAK2T0TDL-1AW1ZABHA 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 312 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 406
Write 288
Mixed 317
SusWrite 119
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 26.1
88% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 347
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 118%
Crucial MTFDDAK2T0TDL-1AW1ZABHA 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 8.7 341 334 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 409
Write 278
Mixed 315
SusWrite 114
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 26.3
89% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 348
262% 350 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 118%
Crucial MTFDDAK2T0TDL-1AW1ZABHA 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 59 346 335 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 410
Write 277
Mixed 312
SusWrite 123
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 25.9
90% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 347
261% 348 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 118%
Crucial MTFDDAK2T0TDL-1AW1ZABHA 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 302 333 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 400
Write 271
Mixed 316
SusWrite 106
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 26.2
89% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 349
262% 350 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CVF 12x31.9GB
12 of 24 slots used
383GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
162% Outstanding
MC Read 63.5
MC Write 80
MC Mixed 62.2
196% 68.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 135%
This bench: 162%
Great: 166%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SLIC-WKS Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO

System: HP SLIC-WKS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback