Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD 3020e Graphics 2,539 User benchmarks, average bench 33% FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Memory 13.8 1-Core 52.7 2-Core 107 29% 58 Pts	4-Core 90.8 8-Core 96 12% 93.4 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics 17,211 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 3805) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.50.26.08 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	3.9% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 5.6 Parallax 6.5 4% 5.47 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 7.5 5% 5.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.9% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G-1101 256GB 6,320 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20290001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 259 250 285 249 314 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 441 Write 249 Mixed 286 SusWrite 267 69% 311 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 47.5 4K Mixed 26.8 82% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 271 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 154 126% 184 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 188%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3310MJ86H9F-3200 1x4GB 106 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	24% Poor	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 9.5 28% 9.87 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 1 6% 2.03 GB/s	Latency 370 11% 370 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	185x
Ryzen 3 3250U GraphicsAMDBench 38%, 10,258 samples	131x
Athlon Silver 3050U GraphicsAMDBench 35%, 5,719 samples	56x

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 17,211 samples	222x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	185x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	26x

SSD
SKHynix_HFM256GDHTNI-87A0B 256GBBench 143%, 4,825 samples	88x
PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-256G-1101 256GBWDCBench 129%, 5,242 samples	62x
MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 9,692 samples	49x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBSamsungBench 65%, 2,729 samples	62x
M471A5244CB0-CWE Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E! 8GBSamsungBench 60%, 695 samples	61x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	36x