Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	54.1% Above average	Memory 69.6 1-Core 86.3 2-Core 148 60% 101 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 226 30% 225 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 7C47) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.33% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.17 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 1 Splatting 2 2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.33% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB 15,164 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF870400 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 200 Write 112 Mixed 86.8 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 9.4 1,630% 8.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 160%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-016.A00LF Elpida EBJ41UF8BCF0-DJ-F 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.4% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8 25% 8.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 8.6 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	2x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	2x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	1x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow mS200 mSATA 120GBKingston $100Bench 67%, 901 samples	1x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $34Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	1x

RAM
99U5474-016.A00LF Elpida EBJ41UF8BCF0-DJ-F 8GBKingstonBench 27%, 4 samples	2x
KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX 24GBKingstonBench 55%, 498 samples	1x
F3 DDR3 2666 C11 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 78%, 137 samples	1x

Value: 35% - Below average

Total price: $179

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16