Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120917
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJan 14 '22 at 17:54
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 56%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 69
1-Core 51.5
2-Core 96.3
46% 72.3 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 189
21% 163 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2201 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47% Average
Lighting 53.2
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 59.3
43% 60.1 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 66.8
Splatting 67.8
54% 65.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 47%
Great: 88%
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
Asus(1043 8675) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3537 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 189
Parallax 240
106% 186 fps
MRender 265
Gravity 208
Splatting 160
167% 211 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 122%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG430400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 95 106 43 51 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 389
Write 276
Mixed 228
SusWrite 85
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 11.3
52% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 90.4
DQ Write 49.4
DQ Mixed 18.5
28% 52.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 60%
Plextor PX-256M5S 256GB
156GB free
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 249 286 308 282 279 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 371
Write 360
Mixed 256
SusWrite 274
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 21.4
71% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 152
128% 188 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 95%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$160
309GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 90 90 90 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 111
Write 99.4
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 89.6
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 65%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
6GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 72 55 68 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 76.5
Write 64.4
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 67.7
49% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
84GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 85 86 96 105 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 111
Write 109
Mixed 87
SusWrite 92.8
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 67%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
253GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 109 111 109 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 109
Write 103
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 108
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-439.A00LF KHX1866C10D3/4G 9905403-439.A00LF KHX1866C10D3/4G 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.7
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 32%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback