HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 22:44
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 366
49% 364 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 86DC) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 19.1
15% 18.8 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 17.5
14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB3Q-256G-1006 256GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 349 351 353 353 306 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 430
Write 371
Mixed 241
SusWrite 337
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 31.6
120% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 148
156% 257 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 98%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0711
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 122 121 123 122 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 119
Write 85.2
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 120
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 97%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB
2TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 7.6 14 10 10 9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 37.7
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 10.6
39% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 33%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
931GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 9.3 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 22.9
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 10.7
27% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 41%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
931GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 11 9.2 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 37.2
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 10.8
38% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 41%
WDC WD20 EARS-00J2GB0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 11 9.3 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 27.7
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 8.6
33% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 17.7
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback