Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-1115G4 18,815 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 74.9 1-Core 146 2-Core 235 85% 152 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 365 48% 358 Pts	64-Core 366 23% 366 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 39,662 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Acer(1025 1503) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191 Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	6.79% Terrible	Lighting 12.4 Reflection 13.5 Parallax 14.8 10% 13.6 fps	MRender 0.2 Gravity 1 Splatting 0.2 0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.79% Great: 11%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GB 5,630 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK12.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 689 Write 787 Mixed 731 165% 736 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 54.3 207% 77.8 MB/s	DQ Read 943 DQ Write 747 DQ Mixed 807 614% 832 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 157%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB 14,450 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 14.5 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 16.6 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 90.6 44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	43x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 9%, 39,662 samples	13x
GeForce MX450NvidiaBench 29%, 1,913 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GBKingstonBench 126%, 5,630 samples	14x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1014 1TBWDCBench 211%, 2,940 samples	11x
MZVLQ512HALU-000AC 512GBSamsungBench 149%, 512 samples	7x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples	15x
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 14,450 samples	8x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	6x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16