Today's hottest deals

HP 700-216

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 700-216  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 08:26
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 44.1
1-Core 58.8
2-Core 94.8
39% 65.9 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 185
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
HP(103C 2AE0) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2501.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 7.4
6% 7.53 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 7.5
5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Edge eMe rge 3D-V SSD 256GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 236 16 77 52 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.2% Average
Read 323
Write 290
Mixed 260
SusWrite 114
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 10.3
51% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 80.5
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 20.8
43% 85.7 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030EF68F9W1600 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28% Poor
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 5.4
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-216 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-216

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback