ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP 245 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP 245 G7 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 85B1
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210423
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '22 at 13:37
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 78,189 User benchmarks, average bench 48% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 66.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 200 70% 125 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 484 52% 412 Pts	64-Core 488 30% 488 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% HP(103C 85B1) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.50.02 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	9.86% Terrible	Lighting 12.1 Reflection 12.6 Parallax 17.4 10% 14 fps	MRender 10.7 Gravity 13.9 Splatting 11.6 10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.86% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0C-00AJM0 240GB 3,525 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: 231610WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 130 110 128 114 103 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	146% Outstanding	Read 1,387 Write 970 Mixed 944 SusWrite 157 192% 864 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 84.4 4K Mixed 55.8 179% 60.6 MB/s	DQ Read 648 DQ Write 450 DQ Mixed 543 407% 547 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 146% Great: 189%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 49GB free Firmware: JU007C SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 67 66 68 68 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 134 Write 126 Mixed 56.6 SusWrite 68.1 70% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.6 238% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8HJ-8 V01D4S88GB1G81G82666 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 33.2 MC Mixed 27 86% 30.2 GB/s	SC Read 22.5 SC Write 33.1 SC Mixed 24.6 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 245 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP 245 G7 Notebook PC

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	117x
Ryzen 3 3300UAMDBench 54%, 2,913 samples	34x
A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2GAMDBench 29%, 2,523 samples	25x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	116x
Radeon Vega 6 GraphicsAMDBench 8%, 2,461 samples	33x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,360 samples	25x

SSD
MTFDDAV256TDL-1AW1ZABHA 256GBCrucialBench 68%, 1,090 samples	20x
MZNLH256HAJD-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 73%, 372 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	25x
HP26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 4,524 samples	16x
AO1P26KC8T1-BXPS 1x8GBAdataBench 40%, 2,085 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback