Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 177%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics182% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '22 at 17:43
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 86.8
1-Core 168
2-Core 332
105% 196 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 1,146
103% 869 Pts
64-Core 1,540
95% 1,540 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$795
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
182% Outstanding
Lighting 270
Reflection 237
Parallax 236
220% 248 fps
MRender 237
Gravity 226
Splatting 169
168% 211 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 182%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 268GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,789
Write 5,528
Mixed 6,015
1,430% 6,444 MB/s
4K Read 172
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 142
516% 151 MB/s
DQ Read 714
DQ Write 545
DQ Mixed 632
472% 630 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 81%
Qemu HARDDISK 2TB
498GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 406 390 405 404 398 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 400
Mixed 407
SusWrite 401
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 44.1
141% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 178
140% 195 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 24GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 55
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 43
130% 45.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 35.9
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback