Today's hottest deals

Asus CG8270

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CG8270  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8270
Memory17.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120224
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 17 '22 at 18:34
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 206
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 510
55% 436 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.3% Average
Lighting 58.8
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 61.7
48% 63.1 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 53.6
49% 61 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer A7202 64GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VBM1901Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 136 141 138 142 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 183
Write 134
Mixed 135
SusWrite 131
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 8.5
45% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 6.3
DQ Write 6.9
DQ Mixed 7.6
6% 6.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145
466GB free
Firmware: 3.AFD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 76 75 75 76 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 77
Write 42
Mixed 46.9
SusWrite 74
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 04CB EL64C1C1624Z1 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 04CB EL64C1C1624Z1 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.1% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG8270 Builds (Compare 304 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus CG8270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback