Asrock H570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock H570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 04:49
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$67
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 131
2-Core 249
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 693
70% 566 Pts
64-Core 700
43% 700 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.1% Good
Lighting 75.5
Reflection 92.7
Parallax 79.9
62% 82.7 fps
MRender 81
Gravity 78
Splatting 74.1
63% 77.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HDWR11A 10TB
9.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 166 183 196 214 214 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 220
Write 168
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 196
116% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 119%
Great: 135%
AI Mass Storage 16GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.4 7.9 6.3 8.4 7.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.07% Terrible
Read 7
Write 4.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 7.5
7% 5.18 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.07%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.3% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.7
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 604 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock H570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $158Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback