Acer Veriton M4630G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Veriton M4630G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M4630G
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 08:58
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 193
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 484
53% 421 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 181
Parallax 172
133% 172 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 172
Splatting 119
113% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM04B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 88 85 83 77 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 376
Write 124
Mixed 247
SusWrite 83.9
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 33
118% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 144
127% 188 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$229
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 439 445 457 459 464 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 455
Mixed 429
SusWrite 448
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 44.6
152% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 276
212% 284 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
238GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 382 384 392 370 292 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 429
Mixed 412
SusWrite 366
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 44.3
142% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 243
201% 284 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 125%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
336GB free
Firmware: JE3OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 60 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 71.3
Write 42.1
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 60.5
36% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 0515 CT2K102464BD160B 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 0515 CT2K102464BD160B 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.8% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M4630G Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M4630G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback