Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '22 at 23:11
Run Duration339 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$101
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 219
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 640
62% 510 Pts
64-Core 653
40% 653 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$310
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.1.2
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 138
Parallax 225
93% 159 fps
MRender 211
Gravity 116
Splatting 150
128% 159 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X1480G 480GB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 116 5.1 1.3 3.6 109 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.2% Below average
Read 233
Write 105
Mixed 87.6
SusWrite 70.7
27% 124 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 11.5
53% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 13.8
DQ Write 14.9
DQ Mixed 14.3
11% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
575GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1
Write 0.3
SusWrite 0.2
0% 0.5 MB/s
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate ST3400620AS 400GB-$55
199GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 72.2
Write 52.3
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 73
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 12.8
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback