Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20RH000MUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics7.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 38% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20RH000MUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20RH000MUS
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '22 at 14:28
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 38%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8665U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 0.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 47.2
1-Core 28.6
2-Core 32.9
26% 36.2 Pts
4-Core 70.1
8-Core 92.6
10% 81.3 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P520
Legend(17AA 22A2) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7242
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
7.87% Terrible
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 8.6
11% 11.6 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 1.8
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 7.87%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$139
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 754 482 851 1123 1206 1221 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 627
Write 711
Mixed 705
SusWrite 939
169% 746 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 20.6
65% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 109
80% 105 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 107%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44AM0-CTD M471A2K43DB1-CTD 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 19.5
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20RH000MUS Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20RH000MUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback