Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory35.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210304
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 18:23
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 66.3
1-Core 133
2-Core 264
82% 154 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 747
78% 624 Pts
64-Core 1,010
62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$82
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.7% Poor
Lighting 29.4
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 30.7
24% 30.1 fps
MRender 34.9
Gravity 30.8
Splatting 22.1
23% 29.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0C- 500GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 279 313 233 130 152 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.2% Average
Read 457
Write 446
Mixed 491
SusWrite 247
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 9.8
35% 9.93 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
735GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 86 104 91 78 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 93.4
Write 101
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 86.9
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 83%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00WN9B0 4TB
477GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 18 15 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 38.6
Write 31.7
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 17.1
38% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 20%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
5.5TB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 18 15 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 30.8
Write 31.8
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 17.1
37% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
160% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.8% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 25.3
64% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 24.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,671 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback