Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 21:34
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800B APU (2012 D.Tr)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 54.1
1-Core 25.8
2-Core 74.1
32% 51.3 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 108
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
HP(103C 1850) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1007
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 7
5% 7.23 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 7.3
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD easys tore 240GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EF43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 95 103 129 129 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 421
Write 262
Mixed 145
SusWrite 129
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 7.8
36% 9.43 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
S M U M 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.5% Poor
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 8.6
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback