| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Biostar A320MH (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180807 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 23 '22 at 03:47 |
| Run Duration | 212 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.6%
Very good
|
78% 138 Pts
|
62% 507 Pts
|
49% 794 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.6%
Average
|
47% 64.6 fps
|
42% 52.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 345 47 81 62 36 MB/s
|
39.9%
Below average
|
54% 246 MB/s
|
48% 14.2 MB/s
|
10% 15.6 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
698GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 176 174 177 175 175 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
95% 132 MB/s
|
158% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE Adata DDR4 3000 16GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
88%
Excellent
|
92% 32.3 GB/s
|
68% 23.7 GB/s
|
52% 76.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,806 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar A320MH
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 266x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 196x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 123x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 127x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 125x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 111x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $333 |