HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3397
Memory	16.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190410
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '22 at 04:15
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	51%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	60.5% Good	Memory 72.1 1-Core 76.2 2-Core 179 62% 109 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 297 38% 289 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Zotac(19DA 1596) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.3% Average	Lighting 53.3 Reflection 57.4 Parallax 58.4 43% 56.4 fps	MRender 65.1 Gravity 49.8 Splatting 46.4 43% 53.8 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 335 355 349 357 209 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 335 Write 368 Mixed 257 SusWrite 313 72% 318 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 20.6 88% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 59.4 DQ Mixed 77.9 62% 89.1 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 117%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB 192 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 102GB free, PID a307 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 26 27 27 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 25.2 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 25.6 34% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.3 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 8502 1600 CL10 Series EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 8502 1600 CL10 Series 20GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.2% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 14.4 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 96.6 41% 96.6 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	2,469x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,466x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	799x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1,923x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	726x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	490x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	267x
MX500 1TBCrucial $74Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	83x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	78x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	64x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	57x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16