Acer AOD255

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive21.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer AOD255  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE02_PT
Memory0.3 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1024 x 600 - 32 Bit, Χρώματα 1024 x 600 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100901
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '22 at 13:12
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N450
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Memory 20.4
1-Core 4.9
2-Core 9
9% 11.4 Pts
4-Core 6.7
8-Core 8
1% 7.35 Pts
64-Core 7
0% 7 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X14c18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 87 92 95 98 86 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.5% Poor
Read 162
Write 79.7
Mixed 94.6
SusWrite 86.1
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 7.8
29% 8.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 17.8
DQ Mixed 25.3
18% 22.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 414352313238583634443253383030433620 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
4.47% Terrible
MC Read 1.3
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 0.6
4% 1.53 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 0.1
SC Mixed 0.1
0% 0.17 GB/s
Latency 318
13% 318 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.47%
Great: 9%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback