ECS H61H2-M12

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardECS H61H2-M12  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '22 at 04:00
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2010-$40
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 149
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 148
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Nvidia(10DE 0847) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.6
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.4
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 65 94 64 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 105
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 88
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 76%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
94GB free, PID 0201
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 23 24 20 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 22.5
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 23.7
31% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown U3A2G73-13G9HE2B00 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61H2-M12 Builds (Compare 448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H61H2-M12

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback