Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics75.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7810  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '22 at 19:21
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 50.4
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 187
59% 111 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 634
57% 479 Pts
64-Core 2,211
137% 2,211 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M6000 24GB
Dell(1028 1157) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 452.57
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.2% Very good
Lighting 95.9
Reflection 106
Parallax 94.7
78% 98.8 fps
MRender 87.8
Gravity 90.7
Splatting 78.6
70% 85.7 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 90 128 61 80 61 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 71%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$49
928GB free
Firmware: 1V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 134 134 134 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 143
Write 129
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 134
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1A1 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1A1 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1A1 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1B1 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1B1 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1A1 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1A1 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1B1 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 35.9
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback