Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620 5,965 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 60.5 1-Core 51 2-Core 113 44% 74.7 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 433 40% 333 Pts	64-Core 597 37% 597 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 301.42 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 2.1 0% 1.03 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
EK V100 128G 128GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 298 288 300 301 290 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 432 Write 297 Mixed 318 SusWrite 296 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 12.1 52% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 76.9 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 27.6 52% 101 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 84%
Kingmax 240G 240GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 95GB free Firmware: 2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 412 405 407 410 403 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 424 Write 392 Mixed 336 SusWrite 408 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 23.6 4K Mixed 12.5 54% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 33.4 68% 138 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 ATMEL 26DF321 60GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 33 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	46.7% Average	MC Read 21 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 17.4 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 9 25% 8.8 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples	23x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	17x

SSD
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	15x
MegaRAID SAS RMB 247GBLSIBench 103%, 15 samples	11x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x

RAM
M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 ATMEL 26DF321 60GBSamsungBench 54%, 23 samples	13x
HMT42GR7AFR4A-PB HMT42GR7AFR4A-PB HMT42GR7AFR4A-PB HMT42GR7AFR4A-PB HMT42GR7AFR4A-PB HMT42GR7AFR4A-PB ATMEL 26DF321 132GBHynixBench 53%, 9 samples	6x
M393B2G70BH0-CH9 M393B2G70BH0-CH9 M393B2G70BH0-CH9 M393B2G70BH0-CH9 M393B2G70BH0-CH9 M393B2G70BH0-CH9 MXIC 25L3205 132GBSamsungBench 52%, 8 samples	6x

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $117

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16