Packard ixtreme M5140

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Packard ixtreme M5140 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard ixtreme M5140
Memory	20.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100421
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '22 at 11:31
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T 2,528 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	48% Average	Memory 69.9 1-Core 40.7 2-Core 78.1 41% 62.9 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 203 22% 174 Pts	64-Core 227 14% 227 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% MSI(1462 3080) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Lighting 70.9 Reflection 72.6 Parallax 86.3 58% 76.6 fps	MRender 63.3 Gravity 64.7 Splatting 44.2 46% 57.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: 580ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 14 14 15 14 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19% Very poor	Read 119 Write 7 Mixed 30.6 SusWrite 14.2 9% 42.7 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 11 4K Mixed 9.2 32% 9.93 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 26.7 DQ Mixed 32.8 36% 62.8 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 94%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 24GB free Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 135 139 132 140 136 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.7% Below average	Read 151 Write 126 Mixed 121 SusWrite 134 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 12 42% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 139 107% 145 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 88%
Intel 335 Series 180GB-$169 2,872 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 121GB free Firmware: 335t SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 151 151 145 154 145 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.4% Below average	Read 146 Write 134 Mixed 132 SusWrite 147 32% 140 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 11.9 38% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 147 111% 149 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 88%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 52 54 54 54 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	40% Below average	Read 86.5 Write 82.3 Mixed 42.4 SusWrite 52.7 48% 66 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 55%
OEM Ext Hard Disk 2TB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 996GB free, PID 0070 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 24 24 22 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 24.6 Write 25.3 Mixed 22 SusWrite 23 32% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-061.A00LF 9905471-061.A00LF 99U5471-024.A00LF 99U5471-024.A00LF 24GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.7% Poor	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 11.3 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 8.5 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ixtreme M5140 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Packard ixtreme M5140

CPU
Phenom II X6 1035TAMDBench 53%, 2,528 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	1x

RAM
GU502203EP0201 None GU512303EP0202 None GU512303EP0202 None GU512303EP0202 7GBUnknownBench 26%, 3 samples	1x
GU512303EP0202 None GU512303EP0202 None CT25664BA160BJ.C4F 6GBUnknownBench 28%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Packard ixtreme M5140

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Packard ixtreme M5140

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)