Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-7267

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMSI MS-7267  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '22 at 14:28
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual E2160-$47
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 20.3
2-Core 27.3
32% 39.8 Pts
4-Core 44.8
8-Core 23.9
5% 34.3 Pts
64-Core 5.8
0% 5.8 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Gainward(10B0 0401) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
1.28% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 0.7
1% 2.03 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 0.1
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.28%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$15
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.01A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 13 20 22 9.2 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.24% Terrible
Read 7
Write 8.4
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 14.7
7% 9.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 6.24%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.1% Very poor
MC Read 3
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3
9% 3 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 2.4
7% 2.6 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7267 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-7267

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback