Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory29.3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 29.3GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory24 GB free of 29.2969 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '22 at 03:37
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT 6-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 77.5
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 882
85% 701 Pts
64-Core 961
60% 961 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$470
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3675 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Lighting 239
Reflection 224
Parallax 218
195% 227 fps
MRender 208
Gravity 166
Splatting 146
139% 173 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 161%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 161GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,224
Write 2,348
Mixed 1,601
390% 1,724 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 39.6
118% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 126
104% 149 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 59%
Red Hat VirtIO 644GB
363GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 253 158 157 157 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 478
Write 417
Mixed 404
SusWrite 221
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 36.6
119% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 324
250% 342 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 29GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 13616 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 38.7
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 34.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback