HP 700-270jp

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics9.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 700-270jp  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '22 at 09:33
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 80.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 234
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 627
68% 539 Pts
64-Core 627
39% 627 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M360
Device(1B0A 90F4) ≥ 4GB
Driver: 21.5.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
9.67% Terrible
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 12.4
10% 13.5 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 9.8
Splatting 9.2
8% 9.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.67%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK512MBF 512GB
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 417 420 427 435 417 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 376
Write 406
Mixed 291
SusWrite 422
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 30.9
114% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 136
135% 209 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 104%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
58GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 90 90 90 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 92.8
Write 86.3
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 89.4
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5474-013.A00LF Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.6% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 15.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 19.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-270jp Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-270jp

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback