Today's hottest deals

Asrock 4Core1600-GLAN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 9%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock 4Core1600-GLAN  (all builds)
Memory0.3 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '22 at 15:28
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual E2200-$54
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 36
2-Core 69.9
40% 59.2 Pts
4-Core 69.7
8-Core 72.5
10% 71.1 Pts
64-Core 72.5
4% 72.5 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
MSI(1462 2291) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.81
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.99% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.13 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.99%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 25 49 13 45 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 10.3
Write 43.3
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 26.1
18% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 58%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
1TB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 27.8
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 27.8
36% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 4 slots used
1GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
9.18% Terrible
MC Read 1.2
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 1.2
6% 2.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 0
7% 2.4 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.18%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4Core1600-GLAN Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 4Core1600-GLAN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback