MSI Z590-A PRO (MS-7D09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive460% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D09
MotherboardMSI Z590-A PRO (MS-7D09)  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '22 at 15:42
Run Duration352 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 188
2-Core 359
115% 214 Pts
4-Core 661
8-Core 1,075
106% 868 Pts
64-Core 1,871
116% 1,871 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
EVGA(3842 3755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
157% Outstanding
Lighting 232
Reflection 221
Parallax 234
189% 229 fps
MRender 205
Gravity 163
Splatting 144
137% 171 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 157%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
848GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3250 3352 3369 2249 1625 1637 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
460% Outstanding
Read 2,937
Write 3417
Mixed 3,140
SusWrite 2,580
682% 3,018 MB/s
4K Read 87
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 123
405% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 1,434
DQ Write 1,214
DQ Mixed 1,296
979% 1,315 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 460%
Great: 477%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
954GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1770 1816 1825 1819 1835 1825 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
333% Outstanding
Read 2,218
Write 1,764
Mixed 943
SusWrite 1815
377% 1,685 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 68.1
226% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,569
DQ Write 1,280
DQ Mixed 1,278
997% 1,376 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 333%
Great: 363%
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
704GB free
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2599 2642 2631 2642 2596 2607 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
398% Outstanding
Read 1,876
Write 2,470
Mixed 1,818
SusWrite 2,619
498% 2,196 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 89.7
316% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,598
DQ Write 1,346
DQ Mixed 1,445
1,090% 1,463 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 398%
Great: 491%
Seagate ST6000NM0115-1YZ110 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: DA25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 202 204 203 203 204 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 123%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
884GB free
Firmware: SPS6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 114 115 117 115 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 75.9
Write 63
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 114
52% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
180% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 71%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 139 140 140 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 139
Write 69.7
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 139
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Thermaltake Co Ltd R016D408GX2-4600C19A 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
158% Outstanding
MC Read 63.8
MC Write 60.7
MC Mixed 53.1
169% 59.2 GB/s
SC Read 31.3
SC Write 49
SC Mixed 39.6
114% 40 GB/s
Latency 53.1
75% 53.1 ns
Poor: 108%
This bench: 158%
Great: 158%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z590-A PRO (MS-7D09) Builds (Compare 9,290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z590-A PRO (MS-7D09) - $189

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $772
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback