Acer Aspire X1400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire X1400  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X1400
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '22 at 23:23
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 255
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Memory 46.6
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 92.8
36% 61.7 Pts
4-Core 92
8-Core 90
12% 91 Pts
64-Core 91.2
6% 91.2 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 1.6
4% 4.73 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 3.2
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Blackpcs SSDPro 240GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 166 161 161 167 168 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.4% Average
Read 210
Write 172
Mixed 185
SusWrite 164
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 20.2
68% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 58.7
DQ Mixed 33.6
28% 40.1 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
355GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 119 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 89.9
Write 98.2
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 119
66% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5584-040.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
22.3% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 8.7
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X1400 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X1400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback