Today's hottest deals

Biostar A58MDP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A58MDP  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '22 at 06:06
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 87.7
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 99
55% 83.7 Pts
4-Core 82.8
8-Core 80.5
11% 81.7 Pts
64-Core 92.9
6% 92.9 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8370D
Biostar(1565 1708) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 2.3
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 132 176 117 41 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.3% Average
Read 184
Write 174
Mixed 177
SusWrite 105
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 17.5
86% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 28.2
DQ Write 61.8
DQ Mixed 25.9
25% 38.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
873GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 131 166 155 173 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 156
Write 164
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 152
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F6451U67G1600G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.7% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A58MDP Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A58MDP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $51
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback