| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-CS (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190301 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 01 '22 at 15:08 |
| Run Duration | 239 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67%
Good
|
67% 120 Pts
|
50% 376 Pts
|
23% 368 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
|
13.8%
Very poor
|
18% 23.2 fps
|
6% 8.77 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 12 19 50 29 16 MB/s
|
34.9%
Below average
|
56% 252 MB/s
|
45% 15.4 MB/s
|
34% 57.5 MB/s
|
|
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
231GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 139 165 119 89 115 MB/s
|
75.3%
Very good
|
90% 123 MB/s
|
213% 1.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMA41G56AFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
35.7%
Below average
|
35% 12.3 GB/s
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-CS Builds (Compare 901 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $89Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 246x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $62Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 145x |
| Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples | 94x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 116x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 107x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $176 |