Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory121.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '22 at 01:42
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Bronze 3104
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 60.2
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 105
44% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 412
35% 301 Pts
64-Core 633
39% 633 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
137% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 206
Parallax 252
133% 207 fps
MRender 266
Gravity 202
Splatting 176
171% 215 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 137%
Great: 174%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
14.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 232 217 216 216 218 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 242
Write 241
Mixed 114
SusWrite 219
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 1.5
10% 4.1 MB/s
DQ Read 5.8
DQ Write 8.1
DQ Mixed 1.9
3% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA8GL7MMR4N-UH 2x31.5GB
2 of 12 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.6% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback