Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 8 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka) 15,487 User benchmarks, average bench 44% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 53.4 1-Core 63.2 2-Core 97.5 43% 71.4 Pts	4-Core 115 8-Core 158 17% 137 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% PwrHis(1787 2321) 2GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26% Poor	Lighting 33.7 Reflection 36.2 Parallax 43.4 28% 37.8 fps	MRender 29.9 Gravity 31.6 Splatting 24.7 23% 28.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 480GB-$70 1,835 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 421GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 301 340 353 304 362 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 273 Write 293 Mixed 235 SusWrite 329 64% 282 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 13.5 63% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 26.9 DQ Write 96.7 DQ Mixed 36.4 35% 53.3 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 101%
MXT-USB Storage Device 32GB 772 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 25GB free, PID 8816 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	19% Very poor	Read 19 Write 17 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 17.8 24% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 4.6 302% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 6.7 20% 7.13 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

SSD
2.5 128GBRX7Bench 60%, 190 samples	2x
Solid State Disk 120GBSpccBench 59%, 22,489 samples	1x
ARC 100 480GBOCZ $70Bench 86%, 1,835 samples	1x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	1x
99U5471-052.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 47%, 2,479 samples	1x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 1,017 samples	1x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $467