Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics76.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S7  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3099-A1
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '22 at 08:08
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2450 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 71
1-Core 53.2
2-Core 151
53% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 545
48% 410 Pts
64-Core 1,365
84% 1,365 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 86A8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.7% Very good
Lighting 98.1
Reflection 98.4
Parallax 87.9
80% 94.8 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 90.4
Splatting 75.5
70% 87.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM810 2.5" 7mm 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM08D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 218 220 214 213 214 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 218
Write 212
Mixed 187
SusWrite 215
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 15.3
54% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 77.4
DQ Mixed 28.1
40% 76.5 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- M393B5270DH0- M393B5170EH1- M393B1K70DH0- M393B5270DH0- M393B5170EH1- 32GB
800, 800, 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.5% Poor
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIMERGY TX200 S7 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback